Monday, February 29, 2016

"Nothing Much to Do" Hit Vlog Generation Web Series Based on MAAN



Why ‘Nothing Much To Do’ is the one literary web series you should be watching
Lane Francis Worrall
In an emerging library of literary inspired web series, what is it that makes Nothing Much To Do stand out?

The trend towards web series adaptations of literature is a recent one. Most of these production have web series juggernaut The Lizzie Bennet Diaries to thank for inspiring them, and Nothing Much To Do is no exception.

The series translates William Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing into the modern age, transporting Shakspeare’s beloved characters to the fictional Messina High School in New Zealand. Classic would-be couple Beatrice and Benedick are YouTube vloggers who share (highly subjective) accounts of their lives on their separate channels. They are assisted by friends Hero and Claudio, who take time out of their own relationship to scheme to bring Bea and Ben together. A third channel is operated by Ursula (who has been promoted from maid to friend), and features contributions from various members of the Nothing Much To Do cast. As now seems to be the trend with literary web series, there are several accompanying transmedia elements: Beatrice’s twitter, Ursula’s tumblr, and Hero’s instagram.

The updating of the supporting characters for a modern audience has seen some clever choices. Hero’s protective father Leonato becomes her older brother Leo. The Prince, Don Pedro, becomes Student Leader Pedro Donaldson, and his singing attendant Balthasar becomes, well, his musical friend Balthasar.

For me, Nothing Much To Do is the one must-watch literary web series currently airing; it gives many completed series a run for their money as well. Through a combination of DIY-charm, spectacular casting, and bold adaptation choices, this show is the future of literary web series.

Much of the enjoyment of Nothing Much To Do comes from the believability that the creators and cast have managed to imbue into the characters. Both creators and characters are part of the tumblr generation – a group that seems to be half-fandom and half-social justice. This certainly contributes to the realistic nature of the series; the characters are Whovians, they are BeyoncĂ© fans, they have frank discussions about slut-shaming. In an early episode, a character suggests Beatrice not criticise others simply because their behaviour “doesn’t conform to your [her] idea of societal norms.”
 
 
It is a small point, but worth noting when considering Nothing Much To Do‘s believability: this is the first web series that has provided a real, logical explanation for why various characters do not watch each character’s vlogs. That said, the current events of the series are certainly about to test this.

The series also appears to recognise the need for greater diversity and representation in web series, as in all mediums. Hero and Leo’s parents are established to be two women, and, if the not-so-subtle subtext is to be believed, there is the possibility for a relationship between two of the male leads. What is almost as encouraging is the open dialogue the creative team began about this potential relationship, especially when numerous television shows are still (rightly) accused of “queer baiting” their fans without any intention to portray canon LGBTQ+ relationships. That the creators are aware of these issues demonstrates a thorough understanding of their audience, and implies that similar considerations went into their adaptation process.
 
 
 
Benedick (Jake McGregor) and Beatrice (Harriett Maire) / YouTube
 
However, the key to this series is the willingness, and in fact eagerness, of the creative team to question the original source material. Nothing Much To Do is an adaptation, but it is not concerned with simply progressing through Shakespeare’s play and hitting each story beat. Instead, the creators recognise that what was acceptable in Shakespeare’s day is less so 400 years later, while still including references to many of the play’s most famous lines.

 This balance was demonstrated clearly in the most recent episode, when Beatrice was given agency to act on her own behalf rather than delegating to Benedick because her desired retribution against Claudio was not considered to be appropriate for a woman.

Interestingly, the entire series was filmed before any of the episodes were released. This means, unlike many major productions, the creators of Nothing Much To Do now have little opportunity to amend or change the development of the plot and characters; there is only so much magic that can be worked in the editing room or through an additional Q&A video.
 If something is poorly received by their audience, Nothing Much To Do will be unable to retcon the events in the same way The Lizzie Bennet Diaries responded to critiques of slut-shaming by altering future episodes.
As the series approaches its conclusion, this becomes more relevant. The major story beats left to hit are the most outlandish – beware 400 year old spoilers here – there is Hero’s faked death, Benedick’s challenging of Claudio to a duel (although in this adaptation, that could very well be Beatrice’s challenge), and the infamous ‘show your remorse for killing my daughter by marrying her identical cousin instead’ wedding (hey, it’s Shakespeare). Yet if Nothing Much To Do continues in the way it has begun, there is no reason to doubt the adaptation decisions going forward.


Beatrice (Harriett Maire) and Hero (Pearl Kennedy) / Photograph: Lane Francis Worrall

Is Shakespeare the new Austen?

There are other, similarly under-appreciated series, that have achieved similarly applaudable products using the works of Shakespeare. Jules & Monty imagines Romeo and Juliet as college students whose loyalties belong to different frat houses that are engaged in a bitter feud. It is succinct, honest, and features an ending that is in many ways more tragic than what Shakespeare imagined.

 Blank Verse is another Shakespearean series, that tries something new by avoiding the vlogging format while depicting Shakespeare and his contemporaries as modern day creative writing students.
What these series all have in common, outside of their Shakespearean connection, is that they offer something new to the world of literary web series.

Jules & Monty and Nothing Much To Do utilise multiple primary vlogs to show opposing perspectives, while Blank Verse uses a single camera setup and is more concerned with crafting a new plot than adapting an existing one. These creators are not content using someone else’s format, they have developed their own; we can only hope that they will inspire more web series creators, in the same way that The Lizzie Bennet Diaries inspired them.

Nothing Much To Do was created by The Candle Wasters. There is no set schedule, however new episodes generally premiere on Beatrice’s channel each Wednesday, with supplementary material appearing in between on the additional two channels.

Short MAAN Synopsis


Leonato, a kindly, respectable nobleman, lives in the idyllic Italian town of Messina. Leonato shares his house with his lovely young daughter, Hero, his playful, clever niece, Beatrice, and his elderly brother, Antonio (who is Beatrice's father).

 As the play begins, Leonato prepares to welcome some friends home from a war. The friends include Don Pedro, a prince who is a close friend of Leonato, and two fellow soldiers:  Count Claudio, a well-respected young nobleman, and Benedick, a clever man who constantly makes witty jokes, often at the expense of his friends. Don John, Don Pedro’s illegitimate brother, ii part of the crowd as well. He is very clearly "the villain." Don John is sullen and bitter, and makes trouble for the others.

When the soldiers arrive at Leonato’s home, Claudio quickly falls in love with Hero. Meanwhile, Benedick and Beatrice resume the war of witty insults that they have carried on with each other in the past. Claudio and Hero pledge their love to one another and decide to be married.

 To pass the time in the week before the wedding, the lovers and their friends decide to play a game. They want to get Beatrice and Benedick, who are clearly meant for each other, to stop arguing and fall in love. Their tricks prove successful, and Beatrice and Benedick soon fall secretly in love with each other.

But Don John has decided to disrupt everyone’s happiness. He has his companion Borachio make love to Margaret, Hero’s serving woman, at Hero’s window in the darkness of the night, and he brings Don Pedro and Claudio to watch. Believing that he has seen Hero being unfaithful to him, the enraged Claudio humiliates Hero by suddenly accusing her of lechery on the day of their wedding and abandoning her at the altar.

 Hero’s stricken family members decide to pretend that she died suddenly of shock and grief and to hide her away while they wait for the truth about her innocence to come to light. In the aftermath of the rejection, Benedick and Beatrice finally confess their love to one another.

 Fortunately, the night watchmen overhear Borachio bragging about his crime. Dogberry and Verges, the heads of the local police, ultimately arrest both Borachio and Conrad, another of Don John’s followers. Everyone learns that Hero is really innocent, and Claudio, who believes she is dead, grieves for her.

Leonato tells Claudio that, as punishment, he wants Claudio to tell everybody in the city how innocent Hero was. He also wants Claudio to marry Leonato’s “niece”—a girl who, he says, looks much like the dead Hero. Claudio goes to church with the others, preparing to marry the mysterious, masked woman he thinks is Hero’s cousin.

When Hero reveals herself as the masked woman, Claudio is overwhelmed with joy. Benedick then asks Beatrice if she will marry him, and after some arguing they agree. The joyful lovers all have a merry dance before they celebrate their double wedding.

Friday, February 19, 2016

From Much Ado to Hamlet ?? Whedon's Possible Screen Versions of the Bard

"Though This Be Madness, Yet There Is Method In't"

Speculating on Adaptations of Shakespeare

by Carl Wilson

19 February 2016
 
Could Joss Whedon's next Shakespearean film be a sort of Boardwalk Empire meets Hamlet? Or a Chinese infused space western 'verse of Firefly: The Good, The Bard, and the Powerful Ugly?
(press photo) 


To borrow from Hamlet‘s Polonius, there is something of a method to the madness in Whedon shooting a “homebrew” adaptation of Shakespeare’s play, Much Ado About Nothing, during a break on the $220 million franchise mega-hit, The Avengers (Nicholson). Whedon’s idea and execution of a “homecoming party” (Whedon) is wonderfully explored elsewhere in this collection. This essay, on the other hand, shall adopt a posture comparable to that of Much Ado‘s Dogberry, or preferably, Buffy‘s Scooby Gang, in attempting to seek out clues and then speculate on any future Whedon adaptations of Shakespeare.

Through all his types of media, Whedon has consistently pushed himself to be innovative, even when adapting 400 year old plays; so trying to pin-down which project Whedon may make next, and what form it will take, depends on a variety of factors that this essay will explore. Unlike Whedon’s Ord of the Breakworld from Astonishing X-Men, we do not possess time-predicting technology, so there is a speculative sort of “madness” in this chapter, but in equal measure, there is also hopefully something of a method in exploring new endeavours, encouraged by the following quote from Whedon: “I’d love to do more Shakespeare but on the other hand I’d love to do something that I’ve never done before [so] it would have to be a really new enterprise every time” (Carnevale).

The Tragedies of Hamlet and Macbeth
 
As a useful point of orientation, in the accompanying script book for Much Ado, Whedon is asked which play he might consider shooting next, to which he replies: “Twelfth Night and Hamlet are the two favourites of mine” (Whedon and Shakespeare 32). Twelfth Night shall be addressed shortly; for now it is interesting to note that whilst Whedon may love Hamlet, by his own admission it is also the play that he finds most difficult to consider adapting. Much Ado was shot in only 12 days at Whedon’s house, with the purpose of sharing one of the traditional Shakespearean readings that he regularly holds at home with his talented-actor friends. To shoot Hamlet in the same way would be practically impossible. As Whedon explains: Hamlet  is something where I’d have to stand back a bit. I don’t think I can just rattle it off’ (Connelly).

This does not preclude Whedon from ever attempting to adapt Hamlet; rather it suggests that he would have to find a different way of adapting the play. It seems clear that as a Shakespearean adaptation with black-and-white aesthetics, Much Ado entered the theatrical (cinema) market as a niche product that would appeal to a very specific target audience.

However, there is a recently emergent option, which Whedon might consider to reach a wider audience with a broader time schedule: he could create something for Netflix, Amazon Instant Video, or HBO on Demand. “Boardwalk Empire meets Hamlet, or Hamlet shot using the sets from Game of Thrones, would be deeply satisfying prospects. These subscription Video-on-Demand (SVoD) providers are not only buying the rights to provide television series and films to their subscription base of over 70 million households (Sharf; Yarow), but they are commissioning and producing original and innovative content from notable directors such as David Fincher, Baz Luhrman and Woody Allen.

 A mini-serialised adaptation of Shakespeare might be one way in which Whedon could find the creative space and budget to tackle a more demanding play such as Hamlet. Furthermore, without the attached cultural connotations of attending a screening or theatrical production which may act as a barrier to engagement, Shakespeare and Whedon might find new audiences around the world without having to use the less critically esteemed, free online platform of YouTube, which Whedon used for his mini-series: Dr Horrible’s Sing-Along-Blog.

For Whedon, there was much “less pressure” in shooting Much Ado over Hamlet, and he would know, given that there was a reading of Hamlet at his home, with himself performing in the title role (Nicholson); but it would be tempting to think that whilst the settings and costumes within Much Ado were modernised, a performance of Hamlet could also be executed in a way similar to that of the 2015 Manchester Theatre production, which also featured modern-dress but also cross-cast the actors: Hamlet was played by the female actress, Maxine Peake. Much Ado‘s leading man, Alexis Denisof once performed in a Royal Shakespeare Company production of Hamlet as the minor character, Fortibras (View), and he could be promoted to a more significant role, but it is far more tantalising to imagine a Whedonesque female Hamlet, with inner torture comparable to Buffy Summers, the claustrophobic paranoia shown in Echo, the commanding intelligence of Zoe Washburne, or cut from the same classical cloth as Whedon’s (undeveloped) Wonder Woman.

Were the roles to be played “straight”, Hamlet could also be played by Tom Hiddleston – who Whedon directed as the vainglorious Norse trickster, Loki, in The Avengers. In stage and television adaptations, Hiddleston has performed in productions of Shakespeare’s Othello (as Cassio), Henry IV (as Prince Hal), and in the leading roles for Henry V, Cymbeline, and Coriolanus, which would all make him more than qualified to play the Prince of Denmark.

 Furthermore, if Summer Glau channeled her “River Tam” to perform as Ophelia, her characters’ descent into melancholic madness would be a devastatingly beautiful and haunting compliment to the tortured, fragile and duplicitous madness that Whedon has already elicited in performances from Hiddleston.

Still, whereas the Manchester stage production was also filmed live for cinema distribution, Whedon is quite emphatic that he would always prefer “a captured performance, but not in a proscenium way. [...] Making a film that had the energy of a play in the language of film” (Whedon). In wanting to avoid repeating himself, Whedon might not wish to replicate his intent to “evoke a film noir kind of look” as he did shooting at his home in Much Ado (Whedon); instead he might adapt the piece into an entirely different film genre, such as a modern gothic horror, feeding on the same creative impulses that developed The Cabin in the Woods and Buffy.

 If Whedon would also wish to avoid shooting any more adaptations in his house, then he might be able to use sets from his Executively Produced Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. as the television show encompasses sets from ancient underground temple cities, through to chrome and steel modern military operation centres, and as the show is still in production there is a higher likelihood of the sets still being available.

Macbeth‘s dark themes as the characters fight predestination parallel Whedon’s explorations of free will and descent into evil, making it another excellent choice for adaptation. Having also recently starred in Jim Jarmusch’s contemporary vampire love-story, Only Lovers Left Alive, Hiddleston would be a strong candidate for any gothic-themed Shakespeare.

 However, another choice for a gothic adaptation is James Marsters, who has not only played Spike the vampire in Buffy, but has played the lead character in one of Whedon’s readings of Macbeth (Mellor), and has professionally performed on stage in his own abridged adaptation of Macbeth in 2005.

To complement Marsters, and drawing analogies from the same Buffy-punk source to cast Macbeth, one might then cast Eliza Dushku as Lady Macbeth. Dushku has no theatre experience, but in her performances for Whedon she always plays tenacious yet “damaged” characters that make egregious errors in judgment (not always by her own volition) and must deal with the psychological fallout.

 For example, in the episode “Bad Girls” (B.3.14), there are already echoes of Lady Macbeth’s bloody hands scene when, racked with guilt, Faith tries her hardest to wash blood from herself after accidentally killing a man – but fails to remove the emotional guilt and shame (Richardson and Rabb, “Buffy, Faith and Bad Faith”). She and Angel have a similar relationship to the Macbeths as each character pushes the other to stop wallowing in despair, take responsibility, and act to improve their lives.

According to the director of photography for Much Ado, Jay Hunter, “the equipment used on the shoot were two Red Epic with Panavision lenses for the A & B cameras” (Fleischmann), the same technology used to shoot The Hobbit and The Amazing Spider-Man. Using this type of Hollywood technology on what is a relatively low-budget indie project suggests that whatever form of adaptation Hamlet or Macbeth might take, Whedon’s approach is to work to the highest possible standards available, scaling down the production only where necessary due to location or time constraints.

 It might be then, in adapting Hamlet, Whedon could focus on a single aspect of the play, in the same way that Tom Stoppard created the comedy Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead from two minor characters (imagine Nathan Fillion and Alan Tudyk playing the roles); or Whedon could adapt a version of The Scottish Play, in the same way that Akira Kurosawa made the epic Throne of Blood – elevating the spectral elements and bringing in stylistic elements from elsewhere, which for Kurosawa was Noh theatre and feudal Japan, but for Whedon could be aspects from his own past creations (which would be an archeological pleasure for fans) such as the post-apocalyptic future depicted in Dollhouse, or the Chinese infused space western ‘verse of Firefly: The Good, The Bard, and the Powerful Ugly, perhaps?

Do you want to read more of Carl Wilson’s speculations as to how Whedon might tackle Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night and A Midsummer Night’s Dream? The rest of this chapter and more smart writing about the Whedonverse can be found between the pages of After the Avengers: From Joss Whedon’s Hottest, Newest Franchises to the Future of the Whedonverse, by PopMatters.

Carl Wilson is an Associate Lecturer in Media and English at The Sheffield College, UK. Teaching and writing on a variety of media topics, his work has recently appeared in four volumes of the Directory of World Cinema series (American Hollywood and American Independent), and three volumes of the World Film Locations series (Vancouver, Toronto, & Havana). Carl looks at UK Heritage film tourism in the recently released Fan Phenomena: Jane Austen, has an essay on “Hollywood North, Canada” forthcoming in Mapping Cinematic Norths, and he is currently developing the multi-media digitisation archive project at Kelham Island Museum, Sheffield.

Wednesday, February 3, 2016

Here’s Why ‘But I’m Never Going to Use Shakespeare in the Real World!’ Is Wrong

(Photo: Unsplash)
(Photo: Unsplash)
This question originally appeared on QuoraWhat is the best way to answer a student who says, “Why are we learning this? We are never going to use geometry or Shakespeare in the real world?”

I was watching an interview with a well-known actress a few years ago. She was opposing nuclear power, and made some statements about the aftermath of 3-Mile Island. After she went on for a while, the interviewer pointed out that she got many of her facts wrong. She was indignant. “This is not about facts,” she said. “It’s about feelings!”

Many, maybe most people have a similar approach to life. There is a marvelous description of this attitude in the wonderful book, Uncommon Sense by Alan Cromer. Most of the world makes decisions based on feelings, not taking into account thoughtful analysis. Yet nothing conflicts with good decision making as much as giving in to this instinct.

In my mind, Shakespeare and Geometry teach the most essential lessons needed for a productive and successful life. Properly taught, they teach you to think, to take in the evidence, to analyze, and to deduce. My favorite Shakespeare course was taught by Prof. Hugh Richmond at Berkeley; I went to all the lectures (as an auditor) and did the readings while I was a graduate student earning my Ph.D. in physics at Berkeley, but this course was very important to me. Whenever I see Prof. Richmond, I thank him yet again for this course. No course gave me more insight into human behavior. Or about writing and persuasion—Shakespeare’s methods for convincing us of his insights.

Think of Antony’s great speech, “Friends, Romans, Countrymen …” and how he brings a hostile crowd to his own point of view. In what other course would you learn how to do that? Is that a skill that will prove useful in your future life? Let me ask that differently. Is there any more important skill?

And it is not just the way that Antony does it. It is the very fact that he does it. Recognize that, and you become aware of an aspect of life that you don’t get in a physics or engineering course.
About writing…Shakespeare sets the standard, not in flowery language, but in vivid language, language that makes you understand what it is that Shakespeare wanted you to understand. That’s why you need to read (or better yet—watch) the originals, not the short study guides designed to give you the plot and help you with a pop quiz.

Think of what we learn about life and love from Much Ado About Nothing, about how two people who hate each other can change and feel deep and true love towards each other. I can go on and on, and if you had a good Shakespeare course, so can you. Many of the great books are comparably good; I particularly love the Russian novels, especially War and Peace. But I sometimes just sink into Moby Dick and read it again.

Geometry is the class that teaches us about logical thinking, about what it means to draw a conclusion, about the meaning of truth and how we can test it to see if it is correct or false. Most reality cannot be reduced to simple theorems in the way we do for geometry, but a study of that subject shows us that at least some truths really do exist; some speculation is definitely false, and with careful thought and analysis, you can (at least sometimes) tell the difference.

Of course, there is a limited amount you can learn from these courses. They are really meant to trigger a lifelong learning, of logic, of literature, of books and plays, of fact-based knowledge and knowledge of people and persuasion, a lifelong learning that informs and educates. Stick with it for a few decades and you will understand and be able to control and influence much of the world around you.

If the actress I was referring to had studied geometry, maybe she wouldn’t have been so cavalier about whether facts matter; if she had studied Shakespeare, maybe she wouldn’t have been so cavalier about total trust in the guidance of feelings.

If you are older, and feel that you don’t understand the world; if you feel powerless and cheated out of life, it just may be because you didn’t study Shakespeare or Geometry when you were younger, or because you just got through them, instead of getting into them.