Saturday, April 12, 2014

Some Shakespearean Factoids That Might Have Escaped You


10 Things You Didn't Know About Shakespeare

What little we know about the world's greatest poet and dramatist, William Shakespeare, have made him an enigmatic figure. Some imaginative people have even concluded that he wasn't who he was after all (and why shouldn't he be Francis Bacon, Christopher Marlowe, the Earl of Oxford and Queen Elizabeth I's by-blow all at once? Wake up sheeple.)
But what we do know about the man and his works is intriguing enough. Snap up these unconsidered trifles:
1. Shakespeare wasn't the only Shakespeare in the theatre.
His brother Edmund, sixteen years his junior, became an actor in London too, though without making much of a mark. His death at the age of twenty-seven was followed by a funeral in St Saviour's Church, Southwark, which was an expensive one - indicating a local relative with money. Which brings us to...
2. Shakespeare was a fat cat.
From his career in the theatre, which included acting, play-writing, and being a "sharer" in the profits of his company, Shakespeare amassed a comfortable fortune. By the age of 33 he was able to buy New Place, the second largest house in Stratford-upon-Avon. Later he bought property in London as well as Stratford. In his will he was able to bequeath to his second daughter Judith - not even his main beneficiary - the sum of three hundred pounds. Converting Elizabethan money is notoriously tricky, but £50,000 would about do it today. By contrast, his fellow playwright Thomas Dekker was in and out of debtors' prison his whole lifehis whole life. At his death in 1632 his widow renounced administration of his estate - meaning there was nothing to administer.
3. Shakespeare was a co-writer.
It was common for playwrights of Shakespeare's time to collaborate. Sometimes three or four writers would have a hand in a single play. While Shakespeare seems to have liked working alone, there are passages aplenty in the plays that were written by someone else. He worked with Thomas Middleton on Timon of Athens, and with John Fletcher on Henry VIII. As for some of the most famous parts of Macbeth - the witchy bits - it's likely they were Middleton's work too, bolted on to the play at a later date.
4. You speak Shakespeare.
In spite of his reputation among literature-averse students for flowery language, Shakespeare directly created a great deal of the English we use today. Not only is he recorded as the first user of more words than any other writer, he also made words up: we owe him eyeball, bloodstained, radiance, assassination and lackluster, to name but a few. And his phrases are so embedded in the language, chances are you've used some of them in the last week or so: if for example you've been in a pickle, seen better days, or caught a cold, or been a laughing stock, or had to break the ice, or said good riddance...
5. Shakespeare's sonnets are not autobiographical.
OK, we don't know that for sure. But what we do know is that the writing of sonnet sequences was very fashionable in his day. Spenser, Sidney and many others turned them out. Sonnets were a stylised way of demonstrating your technical skill. You didn't have to be actually panting with unrequited love to write them. The beautiful young man and the Dark Lady of Shakespeare's sonnets may have originals, at some remove. More likely is that when Shakespeare wrote sonnets the essential dramatist in him kicked in, creating characters and drama.
6. Shakespeare's daughter was illiterate.
Of William and Anne Shakespeare's three children, two daughters survived: Susannah and Judith. While Susannah seems to have been able to sign her name, Judith could only make her mark. But in this period, literacy was a skill, useful in certain trades and professions, mainly male. Shakespeare was a man of his time, and his time didn't value literacy in women.
7. Shakespeare didn't care about posterity.
At least, as far as his plays went. He took care to supervise the printing of his two narrative poems, Venus and Adonis and The Rape of Lucrece, because these were prestige projects for influential patrons. But it was not until seven years after his death that his theatrical associates put together the First Folio edition of his plays. In his lifetime, Shakespeare doesn't seem to have cared whether his plays survived or not. Partly this may reflect the low esteem in which plays were held as literature. When Ben Jonson printed his plays and called them his Works, people laughed: how could you call mere plays Works?
8. Shakespeare has no descendants.
His only son, Hamnet, died at the age of 11. His daughter Susanna had no children and all his daughter Judith's children died young. None of his three brothers married. The Shakespeare line effectively ran out within twenty-five years of the poet's death.
9. For two hundred years, the theatre made a dog's breakfast of Shakespeare.
Once the theatres reopened after the Commonwealth, they began a great tradition of doing whatever the hell they liked with Shakespeare's plays. They chopped them up and adapted them into musicals and pantomimes. Most notoriously, they got rid of the whole 'tragic' thing in the tragedies by giving them happy endings. (In 1681 Nahum Tate turned King Lear into a feelgood fest completecomplete with a wedding for Cordelia and Edgar.) Reverence for 'The Bard' had to wait until the nineteenth century.
10. Shakespeare has had some heavyweight haters.
Not everyone has concurred in Shakespeare's greatness as a writer. Voltaire thought Hamlet the work of a 'drunken savage': George III confided: 'Was there ever such stuff as great part of Shakespeare? Only one must not say so!' And George Bernard Shaw, in a review of Cymbeline, got quite carried away in his detestation of the poet: 'It would positively be a relief to me to dig him up and throw stones at him.' That was in a newspaper. Imagine if Shakespeare had been on Twitter.
Jude Morgan is the author of The Secret Life of William Shakespeare [St. Martin's, $26.99].

Saturday, April 5, 2014

Female Inmates Inspired by the Bard

How Shakespeare Is Helping Women Prisoners Help Themselves


Frannie Shepherd-Bates graduated from college with a passion for theater and the desire to use her art in ways that made a difference beyond the stage. But it wasn’t until she watched the award-winning documentary “Shakespeare Behind Bars” that she discovered the unexpected place she could take acting -- and the unexpected good it could do.
“Shakespeare Behind Bars” is a 2005 documentary about 20 Kentucky prisonKentucky prison inmates in an acting group. Shepherd-Bates decided to launch a similar program in her state of Michigan.
She had already co-founded the Magenta Giraffe Theatre Company in 2008, along with fellow alumni from Wayne State University's theater department. As executive artistic director of the small nonprofit organization, she directs, acts, choreographs, teaches and coaches speech. But what Shepherd-Bates, 29, finds most rewarding now is the side project she started two years ago.
fred buckley
Frannie Shepherd-Bates
“I was really inspired by the work that Curt [Tofteland], the founder of that [Kentucky] program, was doing and the positive impact that work with Shakespeare specifically had on the men in the documentary,” Shepherd-Bates told The Huffington Post. “I felt like it was time to explore programming like this.”
She reached out to a friend at Women’s Huron Valley Correctional Facility, the only female prison in Michigan, with her proposal and began the volunteer-based Shakespeare in Prison project in February 2012. For the first 18 months of Shakespeare in Prison, Shepherd-Bates was its sole volunteer. She now has four other people helping her lead the program, which runs in nine-month sessions.
The women inmates meet with Shepherd-Bates and her team twice a week for two hours at a time in the correctional facility’s auditorium. They share news and updates with one another, warm up with a few theater and improvisation games, and then get to work on the play they intend to perform at the end of the session.
Shepherd-Bates wants the experience to be as democratic as possible, so the women work together to select the plays they'll perform, the sets they'll design and the costumes they'll wear. The first group of women back in 2012 were a bit intimidated at the thought of performing an entire play, so they decided to create a showcase of scenes and monologues from Shakespeare's works. The second session's participants put on "The Tempest." The third group will be performing "Romeo and Juliet" in June.
According to Shepherd-Bates, the prison auditorium isn't big enough to seat all the inmates at once so the group will give multiple performances.
“It’s great for them to be able to perform for the people they live with, do this incredible thing, and have this audience that really appreciates the challenge they’ve undertaken,” she said.
All of the inmates participate voluntarily, and not everyone who joins initially sticks with the program through the full nine months. However, those who stay -- as well as those who jump in along the way -- benefit immensely from the process, according to Shepherd-Bates.
“Women will come in, and at the beginning, they’re very timid about voicing their opinions. But by the end, they know that their ideas are appreciated and valued, and that their opinions matter and make a difference so they’re very vocal again,” said Shepherd-Bates. “Or they might come in from a place of being more vocal -- even to the point of being combative -- and they learn how better to function as part of a team. It’s the complimentary effects on opposite challenges: learning how to speak up for yourself, but also learning how to recognize the value of others’ input.”
Karri Osterhout, the facility's deputy warden of programs, offered a similar assessment of the program's benefits.
"Shakespeare in Prison is a unique program," Osterhout said. "It really helps the women with their communication and leadership skills, and they're empowered through the program. They're challenged to think, behave, ask questions, and put themselves in someone else's shoes."
According to Osterhout, Shakespeare in Prison and the Prison Creative Arts Project are the two theater-based leisure time programs currently offered at the women's prison. The Ann Arbor News wrote on the latter program's 20th anniversary that founder Buzz Alexander had witnessed how "prisonersprisoners 'form a community' around group activities, especially during his students' highly collaborative theater workshops."
Several of the women who have joined Shakespeare in Prison struggled with reading disabilities. Shepherd-Bates believes that working to read, memorize and perform the playwright's lines gave them new confidence.
“We had one woman who, at the end of the first session, said, 'I'm glad I stuck with this because I’ve never finished anything in my entire life.' It's difficult to quantify a step like that, but you know that’s got to feel so good for her,” said Shepherd-Bates.
She decided to use Shakespeare's works because she thinks every woman can find some way to relate to his archetypal characters. Talking about the characters as they figure out how to portray them, the inmate actors can access human truths within the play, empathize with its characters and gain perspective on their own lives.
“So maybe if I’m talking about Macbeth, I have not killed my best friend, but I’ve probably wrestled with ambition and wondering how much control I have over my destiny,” said Shepherd-Bates.
Osterhout also noted that the communication skills and self-confidence the inmates gain on stage seems to translate into how they carry themselves in the prison as well as within their community once they leave.
Shakespeare Behind Bars, the program from which Shepherd-Bates drew her inspiration, has been around long enough to gather some hard data on how beneficial in-prison theater programs can be. Launched in Kentucky 19 years ago, Shakespeare Behind Bars now offers 10 programs in two states. Kentucky's recidivism rate -- the percentage of released prisonersprisoners rearrested within two years for a new offense -- hit 29.5 percent in 2011, which was itself a low. According to Shakespeare Behind Bars, however, the recidivism rate for prisonersprisoners who participate in its programs is a mere 5.8 percent.
For her part, Shepherd-Bates is not permitted to contact any of the women after they leave the correctional facility to learn what happens to them. But she said she has checked public recordspublic records and, to the best of her knowledge, none of the women who have completed her entire theater program, and subsequently been paroled, have since been convicted of another crime or been sent back to prison.
And maybe that suggests one more valuable connection between the stage and life.
“The [acting] performances aren’t perfect, but that’s actually part of what makes them successful. We always say that making a mistake is more of an opportunity to learn than a failure,” said Shepherd-Bates. “When a woman goofs up her lines on stage and another one leaps in to save the day by showing her a script or just moving on to the next line, a bond is formed. They become more of a team there, and they’ve worked together to solve a problem. I am just endlessly inspired by these women